Rheological and Texture Analysis Methods for the Assessment of Viscoelasticity

The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic (oscillatory) rheological method with a novel texture analysis (TA)The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamic (oscillatory) rheological method with a novel texture analysis (TA)method for the assessment of viscoelastic properties of cosmetic semisolids.The instruments used in this study were an air-bearing controlled-stress rheometer (RheoStress RS75, Haake, Germany) and atexture analyser (TA.XT Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK). The model formulation was a standard semisolid emulsion, containingincreasing concentrations of carbomer and xanthan gum, respectively. The rheological methods used were stress sweep (0.5-500 Pa at 1 Hz) and frequency sweep (0.01–10 Hz at 10 Pa). The texture analysis method used was an immersion/de-immersiontest with cylindrical probe.The results were analysed for their consistency with theoretical predictions and the presence of any correlations between themethods. The analysis revealed consistent trends related to two novel TA parameters, stringiness (which decreased with theincrease in thickener concentration) and resilience (which has shown a mild increasing trend). Elastic modulus G’ and viscousmodulus G’’ (both at 1 Hz) were positively correlated to resilience and negatively correlated to stringiness, indicating that thoseTA parameters reflect the viscoelastic status of the sample.